Saturation of Mordell-Weil groups of elliptic curves over number fields#
Points
The process of p_saturation() does one step of
this, while full_p_saturation() repeats until the points are
The method saturation() of the class EllipticCurve_number_field
applies full
AUTHORS:
Robert Bradshaw
John Cremona
- class sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.saturation.EllipticCurveSaturator(E, verbose=False)#
Bases:
SageObjectClass for saturating points on an elliptic curve over a number field.
INPUT:
E– an elliptic curve defined over a number field, or .verbose(boolean, defaultFalse) – verbosity flag.
Note
This function is not normally called directly by users, who may access the data via methods of the EllipticCurve classes.
- add_reductions(q)#
Add reduction data at primes above q if not already there.
INPUT:
q– a prime number not dividing the defining polynomial of self.__field.
OUTPUT:
Returns nothing, but updates self._reductions dictionary for key
qto a dict whose keys are the roots of the defining polynomial modqand values tuples (nq,Eq) whereEqis an elliptic curve over andnqits cardinality. Ifqdivides the conductor norm or order discriminant nothing is added.EXAMPLES:
Over
:sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.saturation import EllipticCurveSaturator sage: E = EllipticCurve('11a1') sage: saturator = EllipticCurveSaturator(E) sage: saturator._reductions {} sage: saturator.add_reductions(19) sage: saturator._reductions {19: {0: (20, Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 + 18*x^2 + 9*x + 18 over Finite Field of size 19)}}
Over a number field:
sage: x = polygen(QQ); K.<a> = NumberField(x^2 + 2) sage: E = EllipticCurve(K, [0,1,0,a,a]) sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.saturation import EllipticCurveSaturator sage: saturator = EllipticCurveSaturator(E) sage: for q in primes(20): ....: saturator.add_reductions(q) sage: saturator._reductions {2: {}, 3: {}, 5: {}, 7: {}, 11: {3: (16, Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + x^2 + 3*x + 3 over Finite Field of size 11), 8: (8, Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + x^2 + 8*x + 8 over Finite Field of size 11)}, 13: {}, 17: {7: (20, Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + x^2 + 7*x + 7 over Finite Field of size 17), 10: (18, Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + x^2 + 10*x + 10 over Finite Field of size 17)}, 19: {6: (16, Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + x^2 + 6*x + 6 over Finite Field of size 19), 13: (12, Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 = x^3 + x^2 + 13*x + 13 over Finite Field of size 19)}}
- full_p_saturation(Plist, p)#
Full
-saturation ofPlist.INPUT:
Plist(list) – a list of independent points on one elliptic curve.p(integer) – a prime number.
OUTPUT:
(
newPlist,exponent) wherenewPlisthas the same length asPlistand spans the -saturation of the span ofPlist, which contains that span with indexp**exponent.EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.saturation import EllipticCurveSaturator sage: E = EllipticCurve('389a') sage: K.<i> = QuadraticField(-1) sage: EK = E.change_ring(K) sage: P = EK(1+i,-1-2*i) sage: saturator = EllipticCurveSaturator(EK, verbose=True) sage: saturator.full_p_saturation([8*P],2) --starting full 2-saturation Points were not 2-saturated, exponent was 3 ([(i + 1 : -2*i - 1 : 1)], 3) sage: Q = EK(0,0) sage: R = EK(-1,1) sage: saturator = EllipticCurveSaturator(EK, verbose=False) sage: saturator.full_p_saturation([P,Q,R],3) ([(i + 1 : -2*i - 1 : 1), (0 : 0 : 1), (-1 : 1 : 1)], 0)
An example where the points are not 7-saturated and we gain index exponent 1. Running this example with verbose=True would show that it uses the code for when the reduction has
-rank 2 (which occurs for the reduction modulo ), which uses the Weil pairing:sage: saturator.full_p_saturation([P,Q+3*R,Q-4*R],7) ([(i + 1 : -2*i - 1 : 1), (2869/676 : 154413/17576 : 1), (-7095/502681 : -366258864/356400829 : 1)], 1)
- p_saturation(Plist, p, sieve=True)#
Checks whether the list of points is
-saturated.INPUT:
Plist(list) – a list of independent points on one elliptic curve.p(integer) – a prime number.sieve(boolean) – if True, use a sieve (when there are at least 2 points); otherwise test all combinations.
Note
The sieve is much more efficient when the points are saturated and the number of points or the prime are large.
OUTPUT:
Either
Falseif the points are -saturated, or (i,newP) if they are not -saturated, in which case after replacing the i’th point withnewP, the subgroup generated contains that generated byPlistwith index .EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.saturation import EllipticCurveSaturator sage: E = EllipticCurve('389a') sage: K.<i> = QuadraticField(-1) sage: EK = E.change_ring(K) sage: P = EK(1+i,-1-2*i) sage: saturator = EllipticCurveSaturator(EK) sage: saturator.p_saturation([P],2) False sage: saturator.p_saturation([2*P],2) (0, (i + 1 : -2*i - 1 : 1)) sage: Q = EK(0,0) sage: R = EK(-1,1) sage: saturator.p_saturation([P,Q,R],3) False
Here we see an example where 19-saturation is proved, with the verbose flag set to True so that we can see what is going on:
sage: saturator = EllipticCurveSaturator(EK, verbose=True) sage: saturator.p_saturation([P,Q,R],19) Using sieve method to saturate... E has 19-torsion over Finite Field of size 197, projecting points --> [(15 : 168 : 1), (0 : 0 : 1), (196 : 1 : 1)] --rank is now 1 E has 19-torsion over Finite Field of size 197, projecting points --> [(184 : 27 : 1), (0 : 0 : 1), (196 : 1 : 1)] --rank is now 2 E has 19-torsion over Finite Field of size 293, projecting points --> [(139 : 16 : 1), (0 : 0 : 1), (292 : 1 : 1)] --rank is now 3 Reached full rank: points were 19-saturated False
An example where the points are not 11-saturated:
sage: saturator = EllipticCurveSaturator(EK, verbose=False) sage: res = saturator.p_saturation([P+5*Q,P-6*Q,R],11); res (0, (-5783311/14600041*i + 1396143/14600041 : 37679338314/55786756661*i + 3813624227/55786756661 : 1))
That means that the 0’th point may be replaced by the displayed point to achieve an index gain of 11:
sage: saturator.p_saturation([res[1],P-6*Q,R],11) False
- sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.saturation.p_projections(Eq, Plist, p, debug=False)#
INPUT:
– An elliptic curve over a finite field. – a list of points on . – a prime number.
OUTPUT:
A list of
vectors in , the images of the points in , where is the number of vectors is the -rank of .ALGORITHM:
First project onto the
-primary part of . If that has -rank 1 (i.e. is cyclic), use discrete logs there to define a map to , otherwise use the Weil pairing to define two independent maps to .EXAMPLES:
This curve has three independent rational points:
sage: E = EllipticCurve([0,0,1,-7,6])
We reduce modulo
where its order is ; the -primary part is non-cyclic while the -primary part is cyclic of order :sage: F = GF(409) sage: EF = E.change_ring(F) sage: G = EF.abelian_group() sage: G Additive abelian group isomorphic to Z/147 + Z/3 embedded in Abelian group of points on Elliptic Curve defined by y^2 + y = x^3 + 402*x + 6 over Finite Field of size 409 sage: G.order().factor() 3^2 * 7^2
We construct three points and project them to the
-primary parts for , yielding 0,2,0,1 vectors of length 3 modulo respectively. The exact vectors output depend on the computed generators of :sage: Plist = [EF([-2,3]), EF([0,2]), EF([1,0])] sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.saturation import p_projections sage: [(p,p_projections(EF,Plist,p)) for p in primes(11)] # random [(2, []), (3, [(0, 2, 2), (2, 2, 1)]), (5, []), (7, [(5, 1, 1)])] sage: [(p,len(p_projections(EF,Plist,p))) for p in primes(11)] [(2, 0), (3, 2), (5, 0), (7, 1)]
- sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.saturation.reduce_mod_q(x, amodq)#
The reduction of
xmodulo the prime ideal defined byamodq.INPUT:
x– an element of a number field .amodq– an element of which is a root mod of the defining polynomial of . This defines a degree 1 prime ideal of , where .
OUTPUT:
The image of
xin the residue field of at the prime .EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.elliptic_curves.saturation import reduce_mod_q sage: x = polygen(QQ) sage: pol = x^3 -x^2 -3*x + 1 sage: K.<a> = NumberField(pol) sage: [(q,[(amodq,reduce_mod_q(1-a+a^4,amodq)) ....: for amodq in sorted(pol.roots(GF(q), multiplicities=False))]) ....: for q in primes(50,70)] [(53, []), (59, [(36, 28)]), (61, [(40, 35)]), (67, [(10, 8), (62, 28), (63, 60)])]