Weierstrass form of a toric elliptic curve#
There are 16 reflexive polygons in the plane, see
ReflexivePolytopes()
. Each of
them defines a toric Fano variety. And each of them has a unique
crepant resolution to a smooth toric surface (Section 10.4 in [CLS2011]) by
subdividing the face fan. An anticanonical hypersurface defines an
elliptic curve in this ambient space, which we call a toric elliptic
curve. The purpose of this module is to write an anticanonical
hypersurface equation in the short Weierstrass form \(y^2 = x^3 + f x +
g\). This works over any base ring as long as its characteristic \(\not=
2,3\).
For an analogous treatment of elliptic curves defined as complete
intersection in higher dimensional toric varieties, see
the module weierstrass_higher
.
Technically, this module computes the Weierstrass form of the Jacobian of the elliptic curve. This is why you will never have to specify the origin (or zero section) in the following.
It turns out [Bra2011] that the anticanonical hypersurface equation of any one of the above 16 toric surfaces is a specialization (that is, set one or more of the coefficients to zero) of the following three cases. In inhomogeneous coordinates, they are
Cubic in \(\mathbb{P}^2\):
\[\begin{split}\begin{split} p(x,y) =&\; a_{30} x^{3} + a_{21} x^{2} y + a_{12} x y^{2} + a_{03} y^{3} + a_{20} x^{2} + \\ &\; a_{11} x y + a_{02} y^{2} + a_{10} x + a_{01} y + a_{00} \end{split}\end{split}\]Biquadric in \(\mathbb{P}^1\times \mathbb{P}^1\):
\[\begin{split}\begin{split} p(x,y) =&\; a_{22} x^2 y^2 + a_{21} x^2 y + a_{20} x^2 + a_{12} x y^2 + \\ &\; a_{11} x y + x a_{10} + y^2 a_{02} + y a_{01} + a_{00} \end{split}\end{split}\]Anticanonical hypersurface in weighted projective space \(\mathbb{P}^2[1,1,2]\):
\[\begin{split}\begin{split} p(x,y) =&\; a_{40} x^4 + a_{30} x^3 + a_{21} x^2 y + a_{20} x^2 + \\ &\; a_{11} x y + a_{02} y^2 + a_{10} x + a_{01} y + a_{00} \end{split}\end{split}\]
EXAMPLES:
The main functionality is provided by WeierstrassForm()
, which
brings each of the above hypersurface equations into Weierstrass
form:
sage: R.<x,y> = QQ[]
sage: cubic = x^3 + y^3 + 1
sage: WeierstrassForm(cubic)
(0, -27/4)
sage: WeierstrassForm(x^4 + y^2 + 1)
(-4, 0)
sage: WeierstrassForm(x^2*y^2 + x^2 + y^2 + 1)
(-16/3, 128/27)
Only the affine span of the Newton polytope of the polynomial matters. For example:
sage: R.<x,y,z> = QQ[]
sage: WeierstrassForm(x^3 + y^3 + z^3)
(0, -27/4)
sage: WeierstrassForm(x * cubic)
(0, -27/4)
This allows you to work with either homogeneous or inhomogeneous variables. For example, here is the del Pezzo surface of degree 8:
sage: dP8 = toric_varieties.dP8()
sage: dP8.inject_variables()
Defining t, x, y, z
sage: WeierstrassForm(x*y^2 + y^2*z + t^2*x^3 + t^2*z^3)
(-3, -2)
sage: WeierstrassForm(x*y^2 + y^2 + x^3 + 1)
(-3, -2)
By specifying only certain variables we can compute the Weierstrass form over the polynomial ring generated by the remaining variables. For example, here is a cubic over \(\QQ[a]\)
sage: R.<a, x, y, z> = QQ[]
sage: cubic = x^3 + a*y^3 + a^2*z^3
sage: WeierstrassForm(cubic, variables=[x,y,z])
(0, -27/4*a^6)
REFERENCES:
- sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass.Discriminant(polynomial, variables=None)#
The discriminant of the elliptic curve.
INPUT:
See
WeierstrassForm()
for how to specify the input polynomial(s) and variables.OUTPUT:
The discriminant of the elliptic curve.
EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass import Discriminant sage: R.<x, y, z> = QQ[] sage: Discriminant(x^3+y^3+z^3) 19683/16 sage: Discriminant(x*y*z) 0 sage: R.<w,x,y,z> = QQ[] sage: quadratic1 = w^2+x^2+y^2 sage: quadratic2 = z^2 + w*x sage: Discriminant([quadratic1, quadratic2]) -1/16
- sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass.Newton_polygon_embedded(polynomial, variables)#
Embed the Newton polytope of the polynomial in one of the three maximal reflexive polygons.
This function is a helper for
WeierstrassForm()
INPUT:
Same as
WeierstrassForm()
with only a single polynomial passed.OUTPUT:
A tuple \((\Delta, P, (x,y))\) where
\(\Delta\) is the Newton polytope of
polynomial
.\(P(x,y)\) equals the input
polynomial
but with redefined variables such that its Newton polytope is \(\Delta\).
EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass import Newton_polygon_embedded sage: R.<x,y,z> = QQ[] sage: cubic = x^3 + y^3 + z^3 sage: Newton_polygon_embedded(cubic, [x,y,z]) (A 2-dimensional lattice polytope in ZZ^3 with 3 vertices, x^3 + y^3 + 1, (x, y)) sage: R.<a, x,y,z> = QQ[] sage: cubic = x^3 + a*y^3 + a^2*z^3 sage: Newton_polygon_embedded(cubic, variables=[x,y,z]) (A 2-dimensional lattice polytope in ZZ^3 with 3 vertices, a^2*x^3 + y^3 + a, (x, y)) sage: R.<s,t,x,y> = QQ[] sage: biquadric = (s+t)^2 * (x+y)^2 sage: Newton_polygon_embedded(biquadric, [s,t,x,y]) (A 2-dimensional lattice polytope in ZZ^4 with 4 vertices, s^2*t^2 + 2*s^2*t + 2*s*t^2 + s^2 + 4*s*t + t^2 + 2*s + 2*t + 1, (s, t))
- sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass.Newton_polytope_vars_coeffs(polynomial, variables)#
Return the Newton polytope in the given variables.
INPUT:
See
WeierstrassForm()
for how to specify the input polynomial and variables.OUTPUT:
A dictionary with keys the integral values of the Newton polytope and values the corresponding coefficient of
polynomial
.EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass import Newton_polytope_vars_coeffs sage: R.<x,y,z,a30,a21,a12,a03,a20,a11,a02,a10,a01,a00> = QQ[] sage: p = (a30*x^3 + a21*x^2*y + a12*x*y^2 + a03*y^3 + a20*x^2*z + ....: a11*x*y*z + a02*y^2*z + a10*x*z^2 + a01*y*z^2 + a00*z^3) sage: p_data = Newton_polytope_vars_coeffs(p, [x,y,z]); p_data {(0, 0, 3): a00, (0, 1, 2): a01, (0, 2, 1): a02, (0, 3, 0): a03, (1, 0, 2): a10, (1, 1, 1): a11, (1, 2, 0): a12, (2, 0, 1): a20, (2, 1, 0): a21, (3, 0, 0): a30} sage: from sage.geometry.polyhedron.ppl_lattice_polytope import LatticePolytope_PPL sage: polytope = LatticePolytope_PPL(list(p_data)); polytope A 2-dimensional lattice polytope in ZZ^3 with 3 vertices sage: polytope.vertices() ((0, 0, 3), (3, 0, 0), (0, 3, 0)) sage: polytope.embed_in_reflexive_polytope() The map A*x+b with A= [-1 -1] [ 0 1] [ 1 0] b = (3, 0, 0)
- sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass.WeierstrassForm(polynomial, variables=None, transformation=False)#
Return the Weierstrass form of an elliptic curve inside either inside a toric surface or \(\mathbb{P}^3\).
INPUT:
polynomial
– either a polynomial or a list of polynomials defining the elliptic curve. A single polynomial can be either a cubic, a biquadric, or the hypersurface in \(\mathbb{P}^2[1,1,2]\). In this case the equation need not be in any standard form, only its Newton polyhedron is used. If two polynomials are passed, they must both be quadratics in \(\mathbb{P}^3\).variables
– a list of variables of the parent polynomial ring orNone
(default). In the latter case, all variables are taken to be polynomial ring variables. If a subset of polynomial ring variables are given, the Weierstrass form is determined over the function field generated by the remaining variables.transformation
– boolean (default:False
). Whether to return the new variables that bringpolynomial
into Weierstrass form.
OUTPUT:
The pair of coefficients \((f,g)\) of the Weierstrass form \(y^2 = x^3 + f x + g\) of the hypersurface equation.
If
transformation=True
, a triple \((X,Y,Z)\) of polynomials defining a rational map of the toric hypersurface or complete intersection in \(\mathbb{P}^3\) to its Weierstrass form in \(\mathbb{P}^2[2,3,1]\) is returned. That is, the triple satisfies\[Y^2 = X^3 + f X Z^4 + g Z^6\]when restricted to the toric hypersurface or complete intersection.
EXAMPLES:
sage: R.<x,y,z> = QQ[] sage: cubic = x^3 + y^3 + z^3 sage: f, g = WeierstrassForm(cubic); (f, g) (0, -27/4)
Same in inhomogeneous coordinates:
sage: R.<x,y> = QQ[] sage: cubic = x^3 + y^3 + 1 sage: f, g = WeierstrassForm(cubic); (f, g) (0, -27/4) sage: X,Y,Z = WeierstrassForm(cubic, transformation=True); (X,Y,Z) (-x^3*y^3 - x^3 - y^3, 1/2*x^6*y^3 - 1/2*x^3*y^6 - 1/2*x^6 + 1/2*y^6 + 1/2*x^3 - 1/2*y^3, x*y)
Note that plugging in \([X:Y:Z]\) to the Weierstrass equation is a complicated polynomial, but contains the hypersurface equation as a factor:
sage: -Y^2 + X^3 + f*X*Z^4 + g*Z^6 -1/4*x^12*y^6 - 1/2*x^9*y^9 - 1/4*x^6*y^12 + 1/2*x^12*y^3 - 7/2*x^9*y^6 - 7/2*x^6*y^9 + 1/2*x^3*y^12 - 1/4*x^12 - 7/2*x^9*y^3 - 45/4*x^6*y^6 - 7/2*x^3*y^9 - 1/4*y^12 - 1/2*x^9 - 7/2*x^6*y^3 - 7/2*x^3*y^6 - 1/2*y^9 - 1/4*x^6 + 1/2*x^3*y^3 - 1/4*y^6 sage: cubic.divides(-Y^2 + X^3 + f*X*Z^4 + g*Z^6) True
Only the affine span of the Newton polytope of the polynomial matters. For example:
sage: R.<x,y,z> = QQ[] sage: cubic = x^3 + y^3 + z^3 sage: WeierstrassForm(cubic.subs(z=1)) (0, -27/4) sage: WeierstrassForm(x * cubic) (0, -27/4)
This allows you to work with either homogeneous or inhomogeneous variables. For example, here is the del Pezzo surface of degree 8:
sage: dP8 = toric_varieties.dP8() sage: dP8.inject_variables() Defining t, x, y, z sage: WeierstrassForm(x*y^2 + y^2*z + t^2*x^3 + t^2*z^3) (-3, -2) sage: WeierstrassForm(x*y^2 + y^2 + x^3 + 1) (-3, -2)
By specifying only certain variables we can compute the Weierstrass form over the function field generated by the remaining variables. For example, here is a cubic over \(\QQ[a]\)
sage: R.<a, x,y,z> = QQ[] sage: cubic = x^3 + a*y^3 + a^2*z^3 sage: WeierstrassForm(cubic, variables=[x,y,z]) (0, -27/4*a^6)
- sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass.WeierstrassForm_P1xP1(biquadric, variables=None)#
Bring a biquadric into Weierstrass form
Input/output is the same as
WeierstrassForm()
, except that the input polynomial must be a standard biquadric in \(\mathbb{P}^2\),\[\begin{split}\begin{split} p(x,y) =&\; a_{40} x^4 + a_{30} x^3 + a_{21} x^2 y + a_{20} x^2 + \\ &\; a_{11} x y + a_{02} y^2 + a_{10} x + a_{01} y + a_{00} \end{split}\end{split}\]EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass import WeierstrassForm_P1xP1 sage: R.<x0,x1,y0,y1>= QQ[] sage: biquadric = ( x0^2*y0^2 + x0*x1*y0^2*2 + x1^2*y0^2*3 ....: + x0^2*y0*y1*4 + x0*x1*y0*y1*5 + x1^2*y0*y1*6 ....: + x0^2*y1^2*7 + x0*x1*y1^2*8 ) sage: WeierstrassForm_P1xP1(biquadric, [x0, x1, y0, y1]) (1581/16, -3529/32)
Since there is no \(x_1^2 y_1^2\) term in
biquadric
, we can dehomogenize it and get a cubic:sage: from sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass import WeierstrassForm_P2 sage: WeierstrassForm_P2(biquadric(x0=1,y0=1)) (1581/16, -3529/32)
- sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass.WeierstrassForm_P2(polynomial, variables=None)#
Bring a cubic into Weierstrass form.
Input/output is the same as
WeierstrassForm()
, except that the input polynomial must be a standard cubic in \(\mathbb{P}^2\),\[\begin{split}\begin{split} p(x,y) =&\; a_{30} x^{3} + a_{21} x^{2} y + a_{12} x y^{2} + a_{03} y^{3} + a_{20} x^{2} + \\ &\; a_{11} x y + a_{02} y^{2} + a_{10} x + a_{01} y + a_{00} \end{split}\end{split}\]EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass import WeierstrassForm_P2 sage: R.<x,y,z> = QQ[] sage: WeierstrassForm_P2( x^3+y^3+z^3 ) (0, -27/4) sage: R.<x,y,z, a,b> = QQ[] sage: WeierstrassForm_P2( -y^2*z+x^3+a*x*z^2+b*z^3, [x,y,z] ) (a, b)
- sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass.WeierstrassForm_P2_112(polynomial, variables=None)#
Bring an anticanonical hypersurface in \(\mathbb{P}^2[1,1,2]\) into Weierstrass form.
Input/output is the same as
WeierstrassForm()
, except that the input polynomial must be a standard anticanonical hypersurface in weighted projective space \(\mathbb{P}^2[1,1,2]\):\[\begin{split}\begin{split} p(x,y) =&\; a_{40} x^4 + a_{30} x^3 + a_{21} x^2 y + a_{20} x^2 + \\ &\; a_{11} x y + a_{02} y^2 + a_{10} x + a_{01} y + a_{00} \end{split}\end{split}\]EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass import WeierstrassForm_P2_112 sage: fan = Fan(rays=[(1,0),(0,1),(-1,-2),(0,-1)],cones=[[0,1],[1,2],[2,3],[3,0]]) sage: P112.<x,y,z,t> = ToricVariety(fan) sage: (-P112.K()).sections_monomials() (z^4*t^2, x*z^3*t^2, x^2*z^2*t^2, x^3*z*t^2, x^4*t^2, y*z^2*t, x*y*z*t, x^2*y*t, y^2) sage: WeierstrassForm_P2_112(sum(_), [x,y,z,t]) (-97/48, 17/864)
- sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass.j_invariant(polynomial, variables=None)#
Return the \(j\)-invariant of the elliptic curve.
INPUT:
See
WeierstrassForm()
for how to specify the input polynomial(s) and variables.OUTPUT:
The j-invariant of the (irreducible) cubic. Notable special values:
The Fermat cubic: \(j(x^3+y^3+z^3) = 0\)
A nodal cubic: \(j(-y^2 + x^2 + x^3) = \infty\)
A cuspidal cubic \(y^2=x^3\) has undefined \(j\)-invariant. In this case, a
ValueError
is returned.
EXAMPLES:
sage: from sage.schemes.toric.weierstrass import j_invariant sage: R.<x,y,z> = QQ[] sage: j_invariant(x^3+y^3+z^3) 0 sage: j_invariant(-y^2 + x^2 + x^3) +Infinity sage: R.<x,y,z, a,b> = QQ[] sage: j_invariant( -y^2*z + x^3 + a*x*z^2, [x,y,z]) 1728